Compliance

Cross-Jurisdiction
Obligations and Evidence

One executive view. Obligations tagged by country and entity. Evidence packs per jurisdiction. Different rules, one operating picture.

Multiple Jurisdictions, One View

Enterprise clients operate across borders — different entities, different regulators, different filing deadlines. AEXOS brings it all into a single workspace without collapsing the distinctions.

Obligations Mapped by Entity

Each legal entity in your structure carries its own set of obligations. AEXOS tracks which entity owes what, to which regulator, by when — and surfaces conflicts or overlaps across jurisdictions.

  • Obligations tagged by country, entity, and regulator
  • US and Australia as the default pair
  • Additional jurisdictions as configured
  • Cross-entity conflict detection

Evidence Packs per Jurisdiction

Each obligation can collect its own evidence set — policies, attestations, screenshots, sign-offs. Evidence is scoped to the jurisdiction and entity, so an Australian privacy obligation does not inherit a US FedRAMP control set.

  • Jurisdiction-scoped evidence collection
  • Completion status per obligation
  • Gap identification when evidence is missing
  • Immutable record of what was submitted

AI-Driven Obligation Tracking

The compliance agent monitors regulatory deadlines, filing requirements, and operational obligations across all jurisdictions. Upcoming deadlines surface automatically with recommended actions.

  • Automated deadline discovery and notification
  • AI-proposed compliance actions with evidence citations
  • Status tracking through Decision Queue approval
  • Overdue alerts and escalation workflows

Regulatory Change Monitoring

When new regulations emerge or existing ones change, the system identifies the impact on each jurisdiction and entity, then proposes operational adjustments through the Decision Queue.

  • Proactive regulatory intelligence gathering
  • Impact assessment per entity and jurisdiction
  • Gap analysis against current compliance posture
  • Recommended remediation through structured approval

Compliance Schedule

A unified calendar of all compliance obligations with deadlines, status tracking, ownership assignment, and priority-based ordering. The AI can propose and manage items within the schedule based on its regulatory monitoring.

  • AI-editable compliance calendar
  • Priority-weighted obligation ranking
  • Evidence attachment and completion verification
  • Jurisdiction filters for focused views

Data Classification Engine

Every piece of data is classified at ingestion. Classification is enforced at the system level — the Local Guardian ensures classified data never routes to unauthorised models or external systems.

  • Automatic classification at point of ingestion
  • Policy-enforced data routing
  • Clearance-level access controls
  • Suitable for ITAR, PHI, and classified environments

Classification Levels

ITAR

International Traffic in Arms Regulations. Export-controlled defence articles.

PHI

Protected Health Information. HIPAA-regulated health data.

CUI

Controlled Unclassified Information. Government-designated sensitive data.

Confidential

Organisation-specific confidential business information.

Internal

General internal information. Not for public distribution.

AEXOS is a compliance workspace, not a law firm. It does not make your organisation compliant — it gives your compliance team a better operating picture across jurisdictions.

Compliance that operates, not just documents

Move from static registers to AI-driven operational compliance that actively monitors, alerts, and assists — across every jurisdiction you operate in.